Primal Health Databank: Study

Entry No:1038
Title:Cesarean birth is not associated with early childhood body mass index.
Author(s):Smithers LG, Mol BW, et al
Reference:Pediatr Obes. 2017 Aug;12 Suppl 1:120-124. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12180. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
Place of Study:Australia
Abstract: Among mothers who had a previous cesarean, the authors compared anthropometry of 3- to 6-year-old children who were subsequently born by cesarean section versus vaginal birth. This large population-based study involved linking de-identified administrative perinatal and anthropometric data. Children's weight and height were collected at community-based clinics and converted to age- and sex-adjusted z-scores of height-for-age (HFAz), weight-for-age (WFAz) and BMI-for-age (BMIz). The average treatment effect (ATE) of cesarean versus vaginal birth was calculated from augmented inverse probability weighted analyses accounting for a wide range of confounding variables. There was little evidence of an effect of cesarean birth on HFAz (ATE = 0.26 95%CI -0.35, 0.87, n = 3993), WFAz (ATE = 0.35, 95%CI -0.19, 0.89, n = 4817) or BMIz (ATE = 0.11, 95%CI -0.25, 0.46, n = 3909).
Keyword(s):body mass index, caesarean, cesarean
Discussion:No discussion mentioned for this entry
See Also:No related entries mentioned for this entry

Go Back | New Keyword Search